Connect with us


Promoting Hindi as medium of news over Kokborok will backfire

Discarding the importance of indigenous language will backfire. Promoting Hindi will not be done by sidelining Kokborok

Indic Post



The failure to recognize local or indigenous languages was one of the major sources of conflict in many countries. Even it played a profound role in the creation of Bangladesh, as Pakistan adopted Urdu as the national language. This alienated those who spoke Bengali in East Pakistan and the students protested. The rest is history.

Tripura government’s move to make Hindi as medium of news leaves Kokborok, the indigenous language of the state, sidelined

So, local languages have their own importance. An indigenous language is intertwined with the very culture of people living in the respective locality. India’s powerful nationalistic organization, the RSS, has been the advocates of promoting local languages since its inception. Even though they are the staunch supporters of the Hindi-movement, the RSS organizations are known for their sensible stands on indigenous languages.

But some reports appeared in national media outlets in last two days state that Tripura’s ruling BJP-IPFT government has given a proposal to make Hindi as medium of news on all local TV channels instead of Kokborok. If the reports are credible, the BJP government got it wrong this time on languages. It will definitely boomerang.

The unfortunate part is that the BJP government has nothing to gain from this move

Kokborok, a Sino-Tibetan language of the Bodo–Garo branch, was declared an official language of Tripura in 1979. Nearly one third of Tripura’s population speaks Kokborok. A proposal like this will definitely hurt the sentiments of the people and make BJP’s prospects bleak in the long run.

During the assembly election campaign, the BJP had promised that Kokborok will be included in the eighth schedule of the constitution, so that it could get the official status. But the same does not seem to be fulfilled yet. The indigenous people are skeptical on the promise in the backdrop of the latest Hindi-promoting move, and the Left has started to corner the BJP.

With this proposal the BJP is giving a ‘good’ political opportunity for the Congress and the Left to attack them. And the unfortunate part is that the BJP government has nothing to gain from this move.

Facebook Comments
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Sanskrit Prayer in Kendriya Vidyalayas all about Indic legacy and Dharma, not about communalism

The moment we become sceptical about our Indic legacy, the game is lost. It’s the Vedas and Upanishads that sculpted the spirit of India




Image: Pixabay

The recent hullabaloo targeting one of the most popular yet powerful mantras in Indic culture over the Morning Prayer in Kendriya Vidyalayas makes no sense, but it assumes great significance in the present socio-political context as one can easily interpret it as a move to undermine the very identity of India.

What’s the issue all about?

An advocate from Madhya Pradesh has filed a public interest litigation (PIL) to ban the morning recitation of the famous ‘asatoma sadgamaya’ mantra in Kendriya Vidyalayas (KVs).

Kendriya Vidyalaya is a system of central government schools in the country that are instituted under the Ministry of Human Resource Development.

As the KVs are state-funded institutions, he thinks chanting the Sanskrit verse is religious, communal, anti-secular, and it needs to be stopped at any cost. And the advocate approached Supreme Court to achieve his mission.

What’s the status?

On January 28, the Supreme Court of India referred the petition demanding a ban on chanting Indic mantras in KVs to a constitution bench comprising five judges. They will decide whether chanting this mantra offending the sesne of secularism in government-run schools. According to Article 28 (1) of the Indian Constitution, no religion instruction shall be provided in any institution funded by the State.

The Indic View: It’s not about religion

The mantra in the limelight is taken from Brihadaranyaka Upanishad, and it goes like this…

Om asato ma sadgamaya

tamaso ma jyotirgamaya

mrtyorma amritam gamaya

om shanti shanti shanti.

The gist of the mantra can be interpreted like this. Lead me from falsehood to truth, from darkness to the light, from death to immortality. It’s all about the cosmic truth and Multiversal ethos. Nothing more nothing less. Connecting religion and communalism with this mantra is totally unacceptable and it needs to be discouraged.

Vedas and Upanishads form the heart of Indic civilisation; one cannot equate them with the present form of religion, indeed in the Semitic sense. The mantras are not about religion, it’s about the culture and heritage of this country, inspiring all Indians to be proud about their legacy.

Great Indic leaders like Maharishi Dayanand Saraswati, Swami Vivekananda, and Sri Aurobindo unambiguously defined the very character of our country. India is all about spirituality and knowledge. The Brihadaranyaka Upanishad itself means the great forest of knowledge. The moment we become sceptical about our legacy, the game is lost.

Not just KVs…

It needs to be noted that many of other public institutions have phrases extracted from Indic texts.

The Upanishad text on Indian State emblem: Satyameva Jayate (Truth alone triumphs- Mundaka Upanishad)

Supreme Court motto: Yato Dharmastato Jayah (Where there is dharma, there is victory- Mahabharata)

Motto of Research & Analysis Wing (R&AW): Dharmo rakshati rakshitaha (dharma protects those who protect it; the Mahabharata)

Indian Navy, Indian Air Force, LIC…. the list goes on and on…

Facebook Comments
Continue Reading


Why China is the most protectionist economy in the world

The communist nation is the most successful champion of protectionism in the recent economic history

Dipin Damodharan



Illustration/Jijin M K/The Indic Post

The world will hear very positive voices against protectionism at the informal meeting of Indian prime minister Narendra Modi and Chinese president Xi Jinping in Wuhan, China, declared China’s foreign ministry spokesperson Lu Kang, on April 23, 2018. Before that, Chinese commerce minister Zhong Shan wrote in People’s Daily, “China opposes all forms of protectionism.”

After Wuhan, Modi and Xi again met in Johannesburg, South Africa, on the sidelines of the BRICS summit in the last week of July. That was the third meeting between the two powerful leaders in the last four months.

Xi had called on BRICS countries to oppose the increasing push for protectionism in Johannesburg. I have no intention to decode the so-called positive voices against protectionism at these ‘peripheral’ meetings.

However, it is intriguing to focus on the new buzzword of China. Of late, Chinese leaders and their media outlets have shown great affinity towards the word protectionism. The above statements on this term need to be viewed in the context of the continuing trade war between the US and China. Communist China is claiming, indeed an insincere assertion with great irony, they are waging a battle against protectionism.

The communist nation is the most successful champion of protectionism in the recent economic history.

One point is right, absolutely. Donald Trump’s protectionism is a two-faced yet futile attempt to make America great again. As the US President has set off the trade war with China by imposing tariffs on $ 34 billion-goods US imports from China, Xi Jinping is on the back-foot now, fearing a colossal setback for Chinese companies in the US market.

The massive drop in the valuation of ZTE, China’s second largest telecommunications supplier, after the US banned American companies from selling components to the telecoms equipment maker for seven years, showed the impact well. But surprisingly, Trump changed his mind later to save the Chinese firm that was accused of selling sensitive information to Iran and North Korea.

Donald Trump. Image/Victoria Borodinova/Pixabay

There’s little doubt that the trade war would be disastrous for China than the US. The projected change in the dynamics of India-China relationship is shaped by Trump’s insane acts of hyper-national trade policy, which has been challenging the liberal world order since his coronation in January 2017.

Now the communist commentators are saying China and India must build new unity to reform old global order. But the million-dollar question is how the ultra-protectionist China can lead a battle against protectionism.

China’s unstoppable economic invasion to developed and low-income countries in the guise of technology and infrastructure has strong political overtones.  The Sri Lankan episode is a classic example. When China offered Sri Lanka more money than it can pay back, the Lankans failed to realize that it was a debt trap. Now, 70 percent stake of strategically important Hambantota port of Sri Lanka belongs to China. The dragon has also got a lease agreement for 99 years.

And, Djibouti is going to become the latest country to fall into China’s debt trap. Even in India, Chinese technology firms are ruling the roost, whether it’s Xiaomi, Oppo, or Vivo.

BRI is a well-crafted blue print to make China a colonial superpower, the dream of their new Mao Xi Jinping.

More than just supporting the tech firms, China wants to nationalise it for achieving their fascist goals. “Communist Party committees have been installed at many tech firms, reviewing everything from operations to compliance with national goals,” wrote Christopher Balding, associate professor of business and economics at the HSBC Business School in Shenzhen, on Bloomberg.

China is exploring strategic possibilities by lending billions of dollars to developing countries under the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI). And this BRI is a well-crafted blue print to make China a colonial superpower, the dream of their new Mao Xi Jinping.

On one side China is opening up the new road to a fascist world order, contradictory to the ideals of liberalisation and globalisation, and on the other side Xi Jinping wants the world to believe that he’s championing the cause of free market as the US is stepping back.

Communist China never wishes to create an open society, and the motto of protectionism seems increasingly apt for them. Why did China say no to Facebook? This simple question will expose their hullabaloo over protectionism. China is a closed society, no matter whatever economic progress it has achieved so far.

Xi Jinping

The communist nation is the most successful champion of protectionism in the recent economic history. Protectionism with aggressive nationalist characteristics is the mantra behind the spectacular show of billion-dollar Chinese companies.

Even some of the poster-boys of Indian startup revolution last year desperately wished that India should take an approach of protecting local companies like China did.

Moreover, the statements made by China in frequent intervals show no intention to back out from their anti-India military agenda, especially when it comes to issues like Doklam and Arunachal Pradesh. India is not going to gain anything substantially by teaming up with China for protectionism and free trade. India needs to tell China that protectionism in all forms should be rejected.

Facebook Comments
Continue Reading


The president is right; universities are not just degree factories

India needs to develop an entrepreneurship-oriented higher education ecosystem to take her growth to next level




Indian president Ram Nath Kovind presenting medal to a student at the 7th Convocation of IIT, Hyderabad. Image/PIB

The speed of fourth industrial revolution seems to be amazing. Changes are happening in an unprecedented manner, revolutionising every area of public life with great impact.

And the conventional mode of learning needs to be restructured in this manner. Education methodologies have to be shaped as per the standards of emerging technologies which include Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Machine Learning.

The 21st century will be crafted by the ideals of fourth industrial revolution

The president of India, Ram Nath Kovind, got right about the change. While speaking at the seventh convocation of the Indian Institute of Technology (IIT), Hyderabad, on August 05, 2018, he emphasized this particular point. As he said India’s aspirations are no longer limited to the heavy industrial base that the nation built in the past.

The 21st century will be crafted by the ideals of fourth industrial revolution. Obviously, institutions like IITs have to remain relevant to the ecosystem of Industry 4.0.

“Colleges, universities and other higher institutions of learning are not degree factories. They are sources of innovation and incubators of technology-driven startups,” the president said at the convocation. He also pointed out the example of Silicon Valley in the US to promote a culture of innovation in the higher education space.

It needs to be noted that the resounding success of Silicon Valley as the global hub of entrepreneurship is the result of Stanford University’s unparalleled contribution to ignite the innovation spirit among young entrepreneurs.

Facebook Comments
Continue Reading